ESG and CSR: from commitment to performance management

Although ESG and CSR share a common foundation of sustainability, they have different operational frameworks and reporting objectives. For financial players, understanding these nuances is essential for performance analysis and risk management. Here we break down their specificities and points of convergence.

What is CSR?

Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is a voluntary framework through which a company integrates social and environmental issues into its business model. This approach, rooted in a long-term vision, aims to optimize the company's impact on its overall ecosystem.

What is the definition of CSR?

CSR is defined as the integration of ethical concerns into an issuer's strategy. It reflects a desire to be accountable to its stakeholders (employees, suppliers, communities), often beyond strict legal obligations. In this sense, CSR is an internal organizational approach focused on corporate culture and the continuous improvement of operational practices.

What are its main objectives for the company?

The objectives of CSR focus on creating shared value. It helps to strengthen the employer brand, optimize energy efficiency, and secure the “social license to operate.” For the company, it is a lever for resilience in the face of crises and a tool for dialogue with civil society.

What is ESG?

ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) refers to the non-financial analysis criteria used by investors and asset managers to assess the sustainability and risk profile of a company in their portfolio.

What is the definition of ESG?

Unlike CSR, ESG is a standardized, quantitative measurement tool. It translates non-financial performance into data that can be used for investment purposes. These criteria serve as the basis for issuer scoring and are now governed by strict regulations (SFDR, European Taxonomy) to ensure data transparency and interoperability.

Why is this crucial for investors?

Integrating ESG allows investors to identify intangible risks that traditional financial analysis does not detect, such as climate risks, social controversies, and governance flaws. For asset managers, it is an indicator of the quality of an issuer's management and a lever for optimizing the risk/return ratio.

What are the fundamental differences between ESG and CSR?

The main distinction lies in the purpose and method of processing information.

Targets and recipients of information

CSR is primarily aimed at operational stakeholders (employees, customers, NGOs). ESG, on the other hand, is designed for financial markets, analysts, and regulators, requiring a much higher level of data accuracy and reliability.

Qualitative vs. quantitative approach

CSR is often based on narrative reports and voluntary commitments which, although essential to corporate culture, limit comparability. ESG imposes standardization through key performance indicators (KPIs) and quantified metrics, facilitating benchmarking between sectors and geographical areas.

What do ESG and CSR have in common?

Despite their methodological differences, ESG and CSR converge towards a global sustainable strategy. Their complementarity is the foundation of responsible finance.

A joint contribution to sustainability

Both approaches aim to transition to a low-carbon and inclusive economy. ESG provides rigorous data and reporting structures, while CSR provides the operational substance and social innovation necessary to achieve the objectives set.

Shared challenges

They address the same critical challenges: decarbonization of activities, preservation of biodiversity, social equity, and ethical governance. They push organizations to adopt practices that ensure long-term viability in an increasingly constrained environment.

Integration: a winning strategy

Yes, their integration is now a necessity. An organization that combines quantitative ESG indicators with the authenticity of CSR commitment has a major competitive advantage. It simultaneously meets regulatory compliance requirements (CSRD) and stakeholders' expectations for meaning, thus ensuring sustainable and credible performance.

‍